
Latest episode
We draw your close calendar as your team runs it, handoff by handoff. The quote follows, once we have seen which reconciliations a person still does by hand.
Financial close automation puts task scheduling, reconciliation matching, intercompany matching and journal posting into the platform, and a person reviews the exceptions. Constancia, an EPM consultancy, does that work for groups whose close runs across several ledgers and has a date it keeps missing.
The close ties out on 4 rungs: local currency, translated, eliminated and consolidated. Automation starts on the lowest rung that agrees to its ledger. A rung that disagrees is data work, and we price it as data work before anything is automated above it.
Where entity accountants email their trial balances on day 4, the group team spends days 5 and 6 loading the files by hand. The close then waits on whichever entity sent the wrong version of its file.
A handoff is 1 person sending a file to another person, and the survey counts every 1 of them.
The platform pulls each trial balance from its ledger on the day the entity closes, and the calendar records the pull as a dated event. The entity accountant then confirms the load, and nobody emails a file.
Bank, intercompany and sub-ledger reconciliations run on rules the group financial controller set, and the ones that agree within tolerance close without a person. Anything outside tolerance lands in 1 queue with the preparer's name on it.
Every task, reconciliation and journal in the close carries a preparer and a reviewer, and the period locks when the last reviewer signs. The record of who signed what, and when, is the audit trail the auditor asks for in week 1.
We watch 1 close from day 1 to sign-off, and we draw every handoff, every reconciliation done by hand and every workbook on a calendar.
The price covers the handoffs and reconciliations the calendar showed, and it holds when a ledger turns out harder to read than its documentation.
The design sets the task list, the reconciliation rules, the tolerances and the sign-off route, each with a named owner in your team.
The same consultants configure the task schedule, the matching rules and the journal posting on the platform your consolidation runs on.
Your team runs the automated close beside the manual one for a full period, and the automated close takes over when the 2 agree.
Nobody joins the programme after the survey, so the person who drew your calendar is the person who configures it.
The last mile of the close runs in a spreadsheet, and the group total exists nowhere else until that person saves it.
Read about consolidationBank, intercompany and sub-ledger reconciliations run into 3 figures a month, and a reviewer signs each 1 on paper or by email.
An audit, a first quarterly report as a listed company or an integration has set the day the close has to reach.
Read about statutory reportingOneStream (EPM software) or its CPM Express edition already holds the group numbers, and the close still runs around it by email.
Read about AI in the closeA single entity closing 1 ledger has a close its ERP already runs, and automation adds little to it.
Constancia is an official partner of OneStream and Abacum, and the survey says which of the 2 your close needs.
A financial close locks each entity's ledger for a period, with every account reconciled and every journal posted, so the balances can be reported. The group consolidation then reads those locked ledgers, and the board pack reads the consolidation.
Financial automation means a system performs a finance task on a rule and a person reviews the result. In the close the tasks are the ledger loads, the matching, the journal posting and the reminders, and the person reviews whatever fell outside tolerance.
The length of a close depends on how many handoffs it contains, because each handoff costs a day while 1 person waits for another's file. A group closing 12 entities through 3 handoffs apiece has 36 places to lose a day, and automation removes that count.
Shorten the close by removing handoffs, and start with the loads: pull each ledger on a schedule so nobody emails a trial balance. Then put the routine reconciliations on rules and move the sign-off into the platform, in that order.
Reconciliation automation is software matching 2 sets of balances on rules and passing the unmatched items to a person. The pairs are a bank statement and a cash ledger, or 1 entity's receivable and another's payable. The group financial controller owns the rules and tolerances, and the auditor can read them.
FMS stands for financial management system, the module of an ERP that holds the general ledger, payables and receivables for 1 entity. A group with 3 ERPs has 3 FMS ledgers, and the close automation on this page sits above all 3.
Every Sunday, 6am
Our weekly newsletter on AI in finance.
Yours to enjoy with your Sunday morning coffee.
The people who would do the work read every message and reply inside 2 working days.
Free guide
Get our AI in finance predictions for 2027
Enter your details below and we will send a free copy to your inbox right now.
Check your inbox for your copy of the predictions.
We use cookies to improve the site and measure our adverts.Read the cookie notice
Strictly necessary
Keeps the site working and remembers these choices. Always on.
Statistics
Counts visits and the pages read, so we can improve the site. Never used for adverts.
Advertising
Lets Google and LinkedIn measure our adverts and show them to people who have visited.