Skip to content

Will AI replace FP&A? It takes the assembly work and leaves the judgement to analysts.

FP&A analysts spend the first 3 days of each month assembling numbers and the rest of the month defending them. AI can take over those 3 days for teams whose actuals trace back to a ledger.

FP&A is 2 jobs, and a model takes over the one whose answers sit in the ledger.

Asked whether AI will replace FP&A, we answer yes for 1 of its 2 jobs and no for the other. The first job gathers the numbers from 3 ERPs and 20 workbooks. The second job decides what those numbers mean and signs the forecast.

A team of 6 analysts who each spend 3 days a month collecting, reconciling and formatting numbers spends 216 analyst days a year on assembly. An AI model reading a planning model that finance owns can take most of those days. The model cannot take the days spent agreeing volume with a country managing director.

When actuals arrive as 20 workbooks with 20 versions of the cost centre list, the model builds a forecast nobody will stand behind. Analysts then spend the time saved working out which list it used. Constancia is an EPM consultancy, and we survey the planning model for this problem before a group buys a licence.

Each FP&A task splits into a half that moves to the model and a half that stays with the analyst.

8 FP&A tasks, each split into the half a model takes and the half an analyst keeps.
Moves to the modelStays with the analyst
Collecting actuals from 3 ERPsThe model loads each ledger through its mapping and flags the 12 lines that failed validation.The analyst decides what the 12 lines are and phones the entity that sent them.
Reconciling the plan to the ledgerThe model ties each plan line to its actual and lists the differences over a threshold.The analyst decides which differences are timing and which are a business change.
Rolling the forecast forwardThe model refreshes the forecast from the agreed drivers and last month's close.The analyst challenges the driver the sales director has left unchanged for 3 quarters.
Writing the variance commentaryThe model drafts a sentence per variance, entity by entity, with the figure it read.The analyst rewrites the 2 that are wrong and adds the 1 the model could not know about.
Branching a scenarioThe model branches the base case, changes the drivers asked for and recalculates the downstream lines.The analyst decides which 3 scenarios the board sees and which 9 it does not.
Formatting the board packThe model fills the pack from the model, with each figure linked to its cell.The analyst decides which page the bad news sits on and how the CFO wants it said.
Negotiating the budgetThe model shows each budget holder the last 3 years of their line and the group target.The analyst sits in the room with the budget holder and comes out with a number both will own.
Signing the forecastThe model records which drivers, actuals and mappings the forecast was built from.The head of FP&A signs the forecast, and the record sits beside the signature for the auditor.

FP&A teams win back the 3 days when their actuals trace back to a ledger.

A planning model built on the consolidation's entities, accounts and periods gives the AI model actuals it can trust. The analyst then gets a forecast with a record of how it was built. In month 2 the team works on the drivers instead of the data load.

A planning model fed from 20 workbooks gives the AI model 20 versions of the truth, and the forecast looks equally confident whichever version it used. In month 2 the team traces which version that was, so the assembly work comes back in a new form.

An AI forecast is useful to the team when it records which cost centre list it read. A forecast without that record gives the team 1 more thing to reconcile.

AI moves the analyst's week from rebuilding the forecast on Friday to defending it on Monday.

Without a model, the analyst rebuilds the forecast on the last Friday of the month and defends it on the first Monday. The rebuild leaves 2 hours to prepare the defence. With the assembly on a model, the Friday rebuild goes and the defence gets the whole week.

On Monday the team discusses why Germany's volume is flat when the pipeline says otherwise, and whether the hiring plan is 3 months late. A model can produce the 3 scenarios, but has no view on which one the CFO should back. The analyst picks 1 and defends it.

Every hour of an analyst's week goes on either assembly or judgement. The model takes the assembly hours and leaves the judgement, which is the work the CFO hired the team to do.

A model on unowned drivers adds a second forecast to argue about and replaces no work.

A driver that nobody outside finance has agreed is a cell an analyst types into. A forecast the model refreshes from that cell still has the analyst as its author, and now it looks more certain. Sales directors who never agreed the pipeline driver reject the model's forecast as quickly as the analyst's.

The model can take over the assembly work once 3 things are in place: a planning model finance owns, drivers the business owns and a consolidation that traces. Those 3 things change the analyst's job. Without them, the group adds a licence and the job stays the same.

Constancia is an official partner of OneStream (EPM software) and Abacum (FP&A software). We review the planning model and the drivers before we fix the price. Our survey shows the head of FP&A which half of the job can move to the model this year.

See more on our

Subscribe on YouTube
  • Latest episode

    How an EPM implementation works, and why the software comes last

Every Sunday, 6am

The Sunday Close.

Our weekly newsletter on AI in finance.
Yours to enjoy with your Sunday morning coffee.

  • AI in finance observations from Alex (CEO) and Brad (COO)
  • Newest video from our YouTube channel
  • AI in finance trends we have spotted each week

Tell us the date you are working to.

The people who would do the work read every message and reply inside 2 working days.