Skip to content

Your finance transformation roadmap, written in the order the data model can bear.

We list the preconditions each phase depends on, put them in the order the model can bear, and the dates fall out of that order.

A finance transformation roadmap is the dated sequence a multi-entity group follows to move its close, consolidation and planning onto 1 data model. Constancia, an EPM consultancy, writes it for groups with a fixed date, after we have read the model the sequence depends on.

Names
Each precondition a phase depends on, and the entity that has to meet it.
Orders
The preconditions in the sequence the data model can bear, with the phases behind them.
Dates
Every phase, once its preconditions have an owner and an agreed duration.

A roadmap names 6 preconditions before it names a date, and the model sets their order.

The dates come last on the list, because each one rests on the 5 preconditions above it.

  1. 01

    1 chart of accounts the group agrees on

    Every entity's local accounts map to 1 group chart with a named owner, and the map lives in a system that keeps its history.

  2. 02

    1 entity list with ownership and currency

    The group holds 1 list of its entities, each with its ownership share, its functional currency and the date it joined.

  3. 03

    Intercompany that matches at source

    Each pair of entities agrees its intercompany balance before the group sees it, and the eliminations run on matched pairs.

  4. 04

    Actuals that load without a workbook

    Each ERP loads its trial balance to the consolidation on a schedule, and the last mile in a spreadsheet has been retired.

  5. 05

    Definitions with owners

    Gross margin, headcount and revenue by customer each carry 1 written definition, signed by the person who would defend it to the board.

  6. 06

    The dates

    Each phase takes a date once the preconditions above it have an owner, a duration and a place in the sequence.

A precondition with no owner in an entity stays on the roadmap as a risk with a date.

Most roadmaps take their dates from the budget round and their preconditions from whatever the build team finds later.

Our consultants have challenged the sequence on 58 implementations over 35 years, and the first draft we see usually starts at the go-live date.

Where a group of 9 entities plans a consolidation go-live for March, the roadmap often shows the chart of accounts agreed in February.

The 9 entity controllers then map their accounts in the 3 weeks before go-live, and the first consolidated close is spent reworking the map.

The roadmap covers the data and the systems, and leaves the operating model to the client.

The boundary is drawn with the programme sponsor before the first phase is dated.

In scope

The sequence of data work, system work and cutover, each phase with its preconditions.

We write the phases from the consolidation outwards: the group chart and entity list first, then intercompany, then the platform, then planning on top. Each phase carries the preconditions it waits on and the person who owns each one.

  • The order of the entities onto the group chart
  • The cutover from the legacy consolidation, with the parallel run dated
  • The planning model, after the actuals it reads are settled
  • 1 owner and 1 duration against every precondition
Out of scope

The operating model, the ERP programme and the choice of platform vendor.

A roadmap can name the month a shared service centre takes over the close without designing that centre, and ours names it. The ERP programme keeps its own plan, and the roadmap records the dates it depends on.

  • Organisation design and the shared service centre
  • ERP selection, reimplementation and the ERP programme's own plan
  • A recommendation of OneStream (EPM software) or Abacum (FP&A software), which comes after the sequence is set

2 roadmaps for the same group differ by whether the dates or the preconditions come first.

The 2 roadmaps carry the same phases and the same platform, and the order of writing sets them apart.

How a finance transformation roadmap dated at the budget round compares with 1 sequenced after the data model is read.
Dated at the budget roundSequenced after the survey
Where the dates come fromThe go-live is fixed first and the phases are fitted behind it.Each phase takes its date from the preconditions in front of it.
What the chart of accounts phase looks likeA workshop in the month before go-live.The first phase, with an owner in every entity and a duration each has agreed.
Where the third ledger's surprise landsIn a change order, after the contract is signed.In the survey, priced before the roadmap is dated.
Who signs each preconditionThe plan lists tasks, so no condition carries a signature.A named person in the entity that meets it.
What the board sees1 go-live date, and later the reasons it moved.The dated sequence, and the precondition each date rests on.

See more on our

Subscribe on YouTube
  • Latest episode

    How an EPM implementation works, and why the software comes last

Every Sunday, 6am

The Sunday Close.

Our weekly newsletter on AI in finance.
Yours to enjoy with your Sunday morning coffee.

  • AI in finance observations from Alex (CEO) and Brad (COO)
  • Newest video from our YouTube channel
  • AI in finance trends we have spotted each week

Tell us the date you are working to.

The people who would do the work read every message and reply inside 2 working days.